{"id":264,"date":"2010-09-09T22:47:16","date_gmt":"2010-09-10T02:47:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revilo-oliver.com\/news\/?p=264"},"modified":"2010-09-09T22:47:16","modified_gmt":"2010-09-10T02:47:16","slug":"the-descent-of-islam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/2010\/09\/the-descent-of-islam\/","title":{"rendered":"The Descent of Islam"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" title=\"Revilo P. Oliver\" src=\"http:\/\/nationalvanguard.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/09\/rpo_1969.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"135\" height=\"157\" \/>by Revilo P. Oliver (pictured)<br \/>\nfirst published by Kevin Alfred Strom in <em>National Vanguard<\/em> magazine, January-February 2003 \/ first online publication at <a href=\"http:\/\/nationalvanguard.org\/2010\/09\/the-descent-of-islam\/\">NationalVanguard.org<\/a><\/p>\n<p>ISLAM, LIKE CHRISTIANITY, is essentially a Jewish cult for <em>goyim<\/em>.  The Koran, however, is not derived from the Babylonian Talmud. Most of  the Koran (Qur\u2019\u00e1n, \u201cthe statements&#8221; (i.e., of God to Mahomet)) probably  was composed by Mahomet after his Hegira, which took place in 622. The  Babylonian Talmud was probably first collected in the Sixth Century and  much of that heap of ordure is of a much later date, although naturally  with forged pretension to great antiquity. It sprang, of course, out of  the festering mentality of the Jews, and while it is most unlikely that  any part of the Talmud as such could have been known to the Jews in  Arabia who influenced Mahomet, they naturally had the mentality of their  race, so it is not remarkable that there are two or three passages in  the Koran that correspond more or less closely to passages in the  Talmud.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>It would be more proper to classify Islam as a Christian sect or  group of sects, since the word \u2018Christian\u2019 properly designates all of  the innumerable sects that attribute divinity to the Jesus who is the  protagonist of the \u201cNew Testament,\u201d although, of course, there is  naturally great hostility between competing sects, each of which claims  to represent the \u201ctrue religion\u201d and even tries to deny the term  \u2018Christian\u2019 to all of its competitors in the salvation-business. It is  true that Mahomet claimed to be the successor of the Jewish Jesus, whom  he, like the Christians, regarded as not having been a christ in the  strict sense of that word (i.e., a divinely appointed king to lead the  Jews to dominion over the whole world), but as a Saviour who, like  Zarathustra, could bestow a pleasant immortality on anyone, regardless  of race, who believed the right dogmas while keeping his reason in  abeyance.<\/p>\n<p>Direct influence of the Talmud on the Koran is excluded because the  Talmud throughout shows a hostility to the Jesus of the \u201cNew Testament\u201d  and to his successors, including Bar-Kokhba, because those christs  didn\u2019t get any effective butchering of Aryans under way. Had there been  effective influence of the Talmud on Mahomet, he would certainly have  refrained from recognizing the divinity of the Jesus in question and  presenting himself as his successor. Islam is strictly comparable to the  many Christian sects, e.g., the Huggletonians, the Shakers, the  Mormons, the Anabaptists of Leyden, the Elect of Shiloh (followers of  Joanna Southcott), et al., which gave their Jesus a divinely appointed  successor or coadjutor. The story of Mahomet was modelled on the  Christian legend: a virgin birth is, of course, <em>de rigeur<\/em> for all  Saviours, but much less common is a claim that the Saviour\u2019s mother  remained a virgin after parturition, as is claimed for Mary in the  Gospel of James and other Christian gospels and is claimed for Fatimah  (Mahomet\u2019s mother) in the Moslem tradition.<\/p>\n<p>It is highly probable (see, e.g., H. W. F. Saggs, <em>Babylonian Civilisation<\/em>, London, 1962; reprinted as <em>The Greatness that was Babylon<\/em>,  New York, 1968) that in the first part of the sixth century B.C. the  Jews were established in possession of the strategic oases that  controlled the trade-routes in the Arabian Peninsula by the last king of  Babylon, Nabonidus, whom, in keeping with their racial instincts, they  repaid by stabbing him in the back, exciting subversion in his kingdom  and finally betraying Babylon to the armies of Cyrus the Great. Cyrus  was the only <em>goy<\/em> whom they tried to cozen by saluting him as  their christ, and it was probably through such flattery as much as from  the bargain they doubtless struck with Cyrus before betraying the  Babylonians to him that they were given privileged status in the Persian  Empire. The Bible and Josephus tell us how a caravan of rich Jews,  their chariots laden with gold and silver while their hundreds of <em>goy<\/em> slaves trudged along behind, set out from Babylon to take possession of  Jerusalem and start exploiting the natives and kicking them around,  while the majority of the \u2018chosen\u2019 stayed in Babylon to continue eating  on the Babylonians whom they had betrayed. When the Persians took Egypt,  their protection was extended to the hordes of Jews who were parasites  on the Egyptian natives.<\/p>\n<p>The Arabian Peninsula was lousy with Jews in the time of Mahomet;  they fostered his new religion at first, just as they promoted  Christianity in the decaying Roman Empire, and they doubtless made  suggestions that Mahomet adopted, but they conspired against him when  they found that he was less than docile. There is a succinct account in  Sir Richard Burton\u2019s <em>Narrative of a Pilgrimage to Al-Medinah &amp; Meccah<\/em>,  which is now available in a Dover reprint. The Moslems, like some  Christian sects, were more or less hostile to Jews in theory, though not  in practice, and there were almost no professed Jews left in the Holy  Cities when Burton visited them (although there doubtless were Jews who  had taken Arabic names and professed Islam to disguise themselves, just  as among us they take Aryan names and simulate our culture in public),  but in general, Islam, like Christianity, guaranteed the Jews immunity  in return for small contributions as tax.<\/p>\n<p>The doctrines of Islam are essentially Christian in the sense that  there is no important dogma that is not paralleled in one or more of the  innumerable Christian sects of the past and present, and Islam itself,  of course, split into many divergent sects that quarrelled about  theological fantasies. Most Christian sects, however, are overtly  proletarian and \u201cpeace-loving,\u201d deprecating violence except when they  run amok in a holy war and enjoy butchering \u201cheretics\u201d for the profit of  the Jews. Islam, however, was less hypocritical and a holy war (<em>jih\u00e1d<\/em>)  is one of the cardinal articles of its faith (except in a few minor and  \u201cheretical\u201d sects that arose long after the time of Mahomet). That was  the secret of its success. The new religion was a means of uniting the  reciprocally hostile tribes of Arabia and launching them on a programme  of world conquest that was phenomenally successful so long as the Arabs  retained their racial vitality. For example, they virtually owned almost  all of India after 1000 A.D. and until the British conquest, and they  conquered Spain and the southern part of France, although they were  gradually driven out of Europe, since at that time our race was less  degenerate and had not lost its will to live.<\/p>\n<p>Islam, like Christianity, served the Jews\u2019 purposes by inculcating  superstitions about the equality of races, teaching that all anthropoids  that believed in a religious rigmarole as an article of faith and  avoided rational thought were equal and vastly superior to persons,  whatever their race, who held other superstitions or, what was much  worse, did not have delusions about the real world. The poor Arabs took  that nonsense seriously (God had said it, hadn\u2019t he, in a confab with  Mahomet?), and were so thoroughly mongrelized that today the only real  Arabs, indeed, the only real Semites, are to be found in Saudi Arabia,  where some of the tribes stayed home and thus escaped much of the  hybridization that destroyed the Arabs in the lands they conquered. It  is possible, of course, that an Arab could be found here and there in  the Islamic countries that the press calls \u201cArab\u201d because one or another  dialect of Arabic is spoken there (Egypt, Iraq, Syria, etc.), but the  population of those countries is a mass of mongrels.<\/p>\n<p>There is one conspicuous difference between Islam and Christianity in  their dysgenic effects, equally pleasing to Jews. With the exception of  some early Christian sects that were exterminated when the Fathers of  the Church wormed their way to power and could start killing their  competitors, Christianity, during the greater part of its history,  enforced celibacy and homosexuality on a fairly large part of our race,  including some of its most intelligent members, through the priesthood  and monasticism, and broke up families and family property by  prohibiting marriages between even fairly distant relatives. Islam, on  the other hand, ordained polygyny and encouraged Moslems to fill their  harems, and engender children by women of all different races; that is  why the Arabic stock was diluted and liquidated so much more quickly  than our own.<\/p>\n<p>Many Christian sects have been more or less theoretically anti-Jewish  in the past, and some still profess to be, but holy men cannot resist  the most indubitable revelation of God\u2019s will, cash, and now that the  Jews have virtual control of the finances of the countries that once  belonged to our race, the various Christian sects are behaving as Rabbi  Schindler predicted a century ago: they are erring daughters trooping  home to their nice Yiddish mama.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u2014 November, 1981<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Revilo P. Oliver (pictured) first published by Kevin Alfred Strom in National Vanguard magazine, January-February 2003 \/ first online publication at NationalVanguard.org ISLAM, LIKE CHRISTIANITY, is essentially a Jewish cult for goyim. The Koran, however, is not derived from <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/2010\/09\/the-descent-of-islam\/\">Read More &#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[46,152,49],"class_list":["post-264","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-essays","tag-christianity","tag-islam","tag-judaism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=264"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":266,"href":"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264\/revisions\/266"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=264"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=264"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revilo-oliver.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=264"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}